|
The following
article appeared, in an editied form, in the September 2007 edition
of Smart Company magazine.
Time to turn the eWork tide
Written
by Ranald Milne
“Resist
teleworking at your peril,” warns analyst firm Gartner. Based
on their most
recent evidence they now believe that companies which are slow to adopt
flexible
working practices will struggle to recruit and retain skilled staff.
Patricia
Roehling, a professor of psychology at Hope College and the former
director of
research at the Cornell Employment and Family Careers Institute, puts
it
another way. “Studies have found that between 75 and 85% of
workers were more
productive when working in a flexible environment, and that employers
can trim
absenteeism by 60%. Workers who are allowed to work remotely report
greater job
satisfaction and commitment and are less likely to voluntarily leave
their job
or look for another job"
However,
a recent report from the European foundation for the improvement of
living
& working conditions showed that 40% less Irish work from home
than the EU
average. Only six of the 27 EU states have lower levels of eWork.
Tony Donohoe,
IBEC’s
Head of Social and Education policy, thinks that the main challenge is
line-managers. “eWorking has thrown the issues of good
management into a
sharper focus. But we are getting cleverer at managing now in terms of
setting
SMART objectives and improving communications. All those kinds of
management
skills are improving and as they improve some of the resistance at line
level
might dissipate.”
Kate
Keenan, a business psychologist, isn’t sure that change will
be organic. “A lot of
firms put policies in place,
but do little to make it work. It is not that they are against staff
working
from home, but they find the whole issue of working out how to manage
people
they cannot see inconvenient – it is a whole mindset change
for a lot of
managers.”
David Forde, the SME manager at Nortel, agrees. “The
problem is less about
technology and more about perception. There's a perception that if
you're ‘at
work’ then you're working. However, work is something you do,
it's not a place.
Around Ireland you'll find many offices that may, at any one time, have
only
40% occupancy and are wasting a fortune on real estate because people
have this
sense that ‘I must have a desk and I must have an
office’. And management have
a perception that, if staff aren’t at their desk and I don't
see them working
then it's difficult for me to manage them. It requires a different set
of
management skills.”
Mike
McDonnell, a director of the Chartered Institute for
Personnel & Development, believes that, "the key factor to the
successful introduction of teleworking is that the culture of the
organisation
must be one that measures outputs, not inputs. An input-driven
organisation
values physical presence or "face time". This is what was measured in
the past because there was no real requirement for people to give
discretionary
effort in their jobs, just that they do their jobs."
And
Joseph Roitz, Director of Teleworking at AT&T
agrees. “Our survey shows that a misconception appears to
have lodged in the
minds of executives. There seems to be a lingering view that unless
workers are
physically monitored, they won’t work. Indeed, ‘the
difficulty of monitoring
output of remote workers’ emerged as the main perceived
obstacle to
implementing remote working. It is true that managers have to get used
to dealing
with staff they can’t see”. But as Mr. Roitz says
“Telework forces managers to
do what they should be doing anyway. There is no reason why, if there
is a
proper system of setting targets, output will not be managed as
efficiently as
before. In fact supervising remotely should instil a better style of
management
by demanding regular communication between manager and remote team
member and
better monitoring.”
So how do we improve the situation here in Ireland?
Gina
Quin, CEO of the Dublin Chamber of Commerce, thinks that eWorking
should be
more actively encouraged by government. She suggests incentives such as
ensuring broadband availability and affordability (Ireland
is currently ranked 23rd
among the member states) and increasing PC penetration by offering zero
VAT on
personal computers.
Sally Anne Kinahan, Assistant General
Secretary for the ICTU wants the government to go much further and to
“oblige employers
to consider flexible working arrangements”. Similar proposals
have recently
been raised in both the U.S. Congress and in the U.K. House of Commons.
It is
the kind of proposal that, according to Behaviour & Attitudes,
a Market
Research company, has the support of 56% of Irish workers.
Tony Donohoe of IBEC cautions against such an approach,
“Pragmatism is the way forward. Benefits must be for employer
and employee. I’m
wary of adopting any messianic approach for fear of not allowing
individual
company and employee circumstances to be considered.”
But evidence from around the world suggests
that a hands-off approach won’t work. The U.S. federal
government has become
tired of waiting for federal agency line managers to adopt its
teleworking
policy and, even though 100,000 of the 700,000 federal workers
currently telework,
is this year withholding US$5 million in funding from every federal
agency not
making telework available to all eligible employees.
In the UK,
a recent report by Oxford University
concludes that
“While more and more people want to work from home, the
benefits of this trend
are being undermined by poor co-operation by both Government and
business over
issues such as transport and the provision of IT. 83% of workers still
believe
that it is not possible to work from home. Yet, 65% are
“very” or “somewhat”
interested in at least one type of telework and 33% of all UK
workers regard their job as
feasible for home-working for at least one day per week.”
But care is needed. Evidence from the ESRI
(Economic
& Social Research Institute) suggests that an informal approach
to eWorking
can be counter-productive. It shows an unusually high incidence of
Irish
eWorkers reporting an increase in work related stress. The ESRI offers
no
explanation but too often employers allow staff to work from home
without first
ensuring that they are suitable candidates for eWorking and that they
have all
the resources and support necessary to do their job. And when it is the
employees themselves who sought the arrangement in the first place they
often
keep quiet about the problems they encounter.
On the other hand, carefully managed
eWorking can reap rich rewards. It can increase employee loyalty and
retention.
It can be an attractive substitute to pay increases. It increases
productivity.
It increases the skills pool, reduces absenteeism and can significantly
reduce
costs. Deloitte & Touche even found that 90% workers were
likely to be more
ethical when they have a good work-life balance.
The longer that we resist eWorking the
greater will be the risk to our economy and our competitiveness.
Already, according
to CB Richard Ellis, Dublin
is the 9th most expensive city in the world for
office rents. Petrol
prices are expected to double in the next 5 years; Dublin
has the slowest traffic speeds of any city in Europe
and problems commuting are the most sited cause of work dissatisfaction
(by 52%
of Irish workers).
And all this is set to worsen. Add in the
ever increasing wages bill and it seems that the time for employers and
government to stop and consider the benefits of eWorking has arrived.
Ranald
Milne is
Managing Director of
Tri-Cubic Consultants Ltd., who provide guidance and practical
assistance with
eWorking.
|